DETERMINISM VERSUS RANDOMNESS
Imperialistic, materialist Determinism is as rubbish and flawed
as Imperialistic, materialistic Randomness.
One might say…
There
is a good reason behind all that happens and all that it is allowed to exist.
Or one might say…
It is all chance, everything flies on the
wings of a chance.
It is all random and there is no logic which applies once
you reach a certain level of knowing something.
Both statements are
correct however their relevance only exists if we consider lack of tangible
information as a variable which it is not taken into consideration in the manner
that it should.
Not Knowing something will always turn into Knowing
something chiefly after evolutionary steps have taken place and more tangible
information becomes readily available to all…
At which point Randomness
ceases.
Randomness is a but a condition of not knowing.
Randomness can only exist as a cover-up label chiefly rather than
admitting limitation and ignorance when there is lack of information, lack of
evolution, lack of advanced wisdom which would render whatever temporarily
unknowable logical and explainable, one nicely calls it random…
That it
is, until more studies do happen, progress and evolution set in and more
tangible information becomes available which would reveal determinism behind it
all.
Now determinism depends upon tangible logic however because all
sciences have their limitations imposed by their level of development and
evolution, one can always find the lack of logic present at some level or
another however such event is only possible because of the ignorance and lack of
information on part of the observer who will call it random.
Random is
just another label for “I don’t know that as yet” – and the “But I will” does
come sooner or later.
Both Determinism and Randomness could use a good
dose of tolerance, humbleness and a good shot of Meaning in their entrails for
at times being so vain...
Hey, this is just my view!
Love and
Light,
Sky a.k.a. JD Aeon
